Yooooooo

  Hello guys. This ill-disciplined life of not sleeping at 1am is definitely not the right kind of life for a jc student that's gonna take her A's in less than a Month's time. But I think sometimes it's really meaningful to pause and consolidate all my thoughts (I'm able to do this very well for my life in general, just can't seem to apply his concept to my academics xD) of course, the recent HC saga has raised a lot of commotion and now I'm extremely afraid to express my personal voice too strongly because you never know who is reading and gonna critic on all my not so sensible point from here, so please spare me if you feel that my comment is inappropriate and close the tab. No hates please. After all, this is my personal space and we're all trying to understand, learn and broaden up our views here. 

Hence, I'm gonna leave my comment here for the HC saga because I think mindless reading and staying neutral is good as in it does not stir trouble and reflects maturity to a certain extent, but not taking a stand in the issue just shows how you don't have an opinion on your own. And here, I wish to have an opinion. In case you guys don't know what it is about, I can't shorten it with enough depth to do justice to the real situation without any misunderstandings created. So if you're interested, you can easily google it. 

(Gonna try to be super generic cause i fear people google and chance upon my blog) To me, I find it bewildering. I find her (the girl who wrote in the comment) being overly critical of the talk. If every problem raised is so absolute to be right or wrong, then there's no room for discussion already. The fault lies in that many things cannot be clear and crisp, and don't have a definite answer as there are too many factors and considerations into play. This doesn't mean we won't discuss them at all. Simultaneously, we also can't discuss all of them.  So if you want to educate (maybe not educate in this point of view if the information offered is already known previously, just raising more awareness to) someone about something, you have to slant to one side of the argument that is more dominantly accepted even though the others who's views are different may be a lot of them, are still minority. I'm not saying that majority is right and in fact there can be so many cases to prove me wrong. But speaking the majority is the most effective way of putting a point across. If you speak the minority, majorities will rebel. I think given the professionalism of the vendor, the information given should be just neutral and it's only good or bad under the interpretation of respective students. Hence, it is not the vendor's fault. Damn, but I feel my interpretation is biased too. I think as long as its said by one person, it's biased. Ok so I just voided my whole argument so don't fault me ok (paranoid HAHA). I think a remark on an individual instead of a topic, it's quite sensitive. 

Okay my second topic of discussion is BGR perspectives. (To be continued cause currently otp with Justin)